The JAM Method
Details
- Author: Ocean Robbins, Shilpa Jain, Tad Hargrave, and YES! facilitators (manual published 2010, programme since 1990)
- Category: Frameworks
- Published: 2010
- Source: YES! (Youth Empowerment Seminars)
- Source URL: https://yesworld.org
- Access: public
Description
A week-long residential gathering for 30 young change-makers built around two principles, uncompromised truth and unconditional love. Developed by YES! since 1990.
Annotation
A JAM is a residential week-long gathering of about 30 young change-makers, developed since 1990 by Ocean Robbins, Shilpa Jain, Tad Hargrave, and the YES! facilitator network. The container has a fixed scale and a defined rhythm. Mornings open with check-in. Days move between cooperative games, partner sharing, big-group dialogue, and embodied practices that work with grief, conflict, and power. The evenings hold ceremony. The week closes with commitment, forgiveness, and appreciation.
The founders frame the method around two principles, uncompromised truth and unconditional love. A JAM is a place to be real and take off masks, and simultaneously a highly appreciative space where compliments and love are given freely. The container only works when both sides hold together, which requires deliberate participant selection, a trusting facilitator team, and a week-long residential setting where trust can deepen across the arc.
The 2010 YES! Activities Facilitation Manual is the consolidated record of the first 20 years of the programme. The manual covers seven arcs in sequence: setting context, building community, team-building, reflection, co-learning and dialogue, race-class-gender-power work, and the closing cycle. Several of the most-loved practices inside the manual, including the Truth Mandala, Open Space, and the Class-Race Exercise, originate in other lineages that the JAM consolidates. The manual itself notes that the practice is learned in the room, not from the page.
The JAM tradition sits outside the ToGather archive's primary fieldwork. We document it here because the container design and the practices inside it travel widely into the kinds of community work the archive does cover, and because the manual is one of the most-cited references in the contemporary residential-gathering field. Communities considering the JAM should expect substantial adaptation: the manual is U.S.-centric in places, and the binary gender framing in particular requires contemporary updating.
Full text
# The JAM Method
*A week-long, 30-person container for young change-makers built around two principles: uncompromised truth and unconditional love.*
Published by [ToGather](https://togatherproject.eu), the research archive on intentional community life. Curation by Sharon Avraham.
## What it is, and what it is for
A JAM is a residential week-long gathering of about 30 people who carry change-making work in their own communities and come together to slow down, do that work on themselves, and build relationships that outlast the week. The container has a fixed scale and a defined rhythm. Mornings open with check-in. Days move between cooperative games, partner sharing, big-group dialogue, and embodied practices that work with grief, conflict, and power. The evenings hold ceremony. The week closes with commitment, forgiveness, and appreciation.
The founders Shilpa Jain and Tad Hargrave name the method this way: "A JAM embodies two core principles: uncompromised truth and unconditional love. A JAM is, above all, a place to be real, to take off masks, to speak one's truth, and to be fully oneself. Simultaneously, a JAM is a highly appreciative space, where compliments and love are given freely and received with dignity and gratitude, and where the intention is towards healing, learning and growing honest, healthy relationships." That sentence is the operative definition. Everything in the manual is a way of holding both sides at once.
A JAM is built for people who are already doing the work somewhere. The selection is deliberate. Participants are accountable to a place, rooted in something concrete, willing to have their worldview challenged, and aligned with the basic values of the container. The manual is explicit that this makes the JAM exclusive and that the exclusion is part of the design. The container only works when the people inside it can stay inside the agreements for a week.
The JAM is a relational and ritual container, not a curriculum and not a movement. It does not certify, it does not train change-makers in a particular tradition, and it does not produce a deliverable. What it produces is a small group of people who have been seen by each other, often more honestly than they are seen anywhere else in their lives, and who carry the practices and relationships back into their own work.
> **FROM THE FIELD**
> The JAM tradition sits outside the ToGather archive's primary fieldwork. We document it here because the container design and the practices inside it travel widely into the kinds of community work the archive does cover. Several archive communities use practices that originate in or share lineage with the JAM toolkit, including check-in circles, partner sharing, and grief practices in the Work That Reconnects tradition. The framework entry is grounded in the 2010 YES! Activities Facilitation Manual.
## Where it came from
YES! was founded in 1990 by Ocean Robbins and a small team of organisers in Santa Cruz, California. In the first 20 years, by the time the facilitation manual was compiled in 2010, YES! had spoken to more than 650,000 students in U.S. schools, run hundreds of day-long youth empowerment workshops, and held over 100 week-long gatherings in seven countries, reaching young people from more than 65 nations.
The JAM format developed inside that broader programme. The framing essay in the manual is written by Shilpa Jain and Tad Hargrave. Jain is a facilitator and partner at YES! whose lineage runs through Shikshantar (the People's Institute for Rethinking Education and Development in Udaipur) and the wider unschooling and grassroots-learning networks in India. Hargrave is a long-time YES! facilitator and the founder of the marketing-for-hippies practice in Canada. Both authors are inside the programme, not academic observers.
The diagnosis underneath the JAM is that young people working on social change burn out from isolation and that conferences make the isolation worse. Conferences run on panels, plenaries, and information transfer. The JAM is the opposite: small, slow, relational, embodied, and structured to make space for what people actually carry. The manual's introduction by Robbins names it directly: "So many of us feel isolated, like we are the only ones who care about our world. At YES! events, we discover that we are, in fact, part of a powerful and growing global community of people who care."
The format has run in two named variants that the manual identifies. The World Jam draws change-makers from across regions and traditions; participants connect their own work into a wider field. The Leveraging Privilege for Social Change Jam is U.S.-based and focused on people working at the edges of class, race, and gender privilege. Both variants share the same container design and the same toolkit.
YES! is open about the limits of who comes to a JAM. The manual names them as the "ongoing inquiry" the programme sits with: participants need English fluency or paid translation, access to passport and visa systems, financial capacity to travel, and usually a personal recommendation from a current or former JAM facilitator. Most participants are college-aged through early-thirties. The manual does not claim the format is universal. It claims the format is one particular shape that works, when the people inside the agreements can hold it.
## How it actually runs
The manual organises its content into seven arcs, and the week's flow follows them in order.
<figure>
<svg viewBox="0 0 720 280" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" role="img" style="max-width:720px;width:100%;height:auto;display:block;margin:24px auto 8px;">
<title>The seven-day arc of a JAM</title>
<desc>A horizontal timeline showing the seven arcs of the JAM week from opening container-building to closing commitments.</desc>
<rect x="1" y="1" width="718" height="278" rx="6" fill="#ffffff" stroke="#e6dfd0" stroke-width="1"/>
<text x="360" y="32" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#857e72" letter-spacing="3">SEVEN-DAY ARC OF A JAM</text>
<line x1="60" y1="160" x2="660" y2="160" stroke="#b59770" stroke-width="2"/>
<circle cx="80" cy="160" r="10" fill="#c97e4f"/>
<text x="80" y="190" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="11" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">Day 1</text>
<text x="80" y="206" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#5b554c">Setting</text>
<text x="80" y="218" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#5b554c">context</text>
<text x="80" y="130" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#857e72" font-style="italic">altar, intentions</text>
<circle cx="180" cy="160" r="10" fill="#b59770"/>
<text x="180" y="190" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="11" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">Day 2</text>
<text x="180" y="206" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#5b554c">Building</text>
<text x="180" y="218" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#5b554c">community</text>
<text x="180" y="130" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#857e72" font-style="italic">check-in, listening</text>
<circle cx="280" cy="160" r="10" fill="#b59770"/>
<text x="280" y="190" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="11" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">Day 3</text>
<text x="280" y="206" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#5b554c">Trust</text>
<text x="280" y="218" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#5b554c">games</text>
<text x="280" y="130" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#857e72" font-style="italic">embodied work</text>
<circle cx="380" cy="160" r="10" fill="#b59770"/>
<text x="380" y="190" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="11" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">Day 4</text>
<text x="380" y="206" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#5b554c">Reflection</text>
<text x="380" y="218" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#5b554c">and sharing</text>
<text x="380" y="130" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#857e72" font-style="italic">partner dyads</text>
<circle cx="460" cy="160" r="13" fill="#c97e4f"/>
<text x="460" y="190" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="11" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">Day 5</text>
<text x="460" y="206" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#5b554c">Co-learning</text>
<text x="460" y="218" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#5b554c">and dialogue</text>
<text x="460" y="130" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#857e72" font-style="italic">Truth Mandala</text>
<circle cx="540" cy="160" r="13" fill="#c97e4f"/>
<text x="540" y="190" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="11" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">Day 6</text>
<text x="540" y="206" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#5b554c">Race, class,</text>
<text x="540" y="218" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#5b554c">gender, power</text>
<text x="540" y="130" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#857e72" font-style="italic">heart, class-race</text>
<circle cx="640" cy="160" r="10" fill="#c97e4f"/>
<text x="640" y="190" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="11" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">Day 7</text>
<text x="640" y="206" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#5b554c">Taking it</text>
<text x="640" y="218" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#5b554c">home</text>
<text x="640" y="130" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#857e72" font-style="italic">commitment</text>
<text x="60" y="262" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#857e72">opening</text>
<text x="660" y="262" text-anchor="end" font-family="Inter, system-ui, sans-serif" font-size="10" fill="#857e72">closing</text>
</svg>
<figcaption style="text-align:center;font-style:italic;color:#5b554c;font-family:Georgia,serif;font-size:14px;margin:0 auto 24px;max-width:600px;">The seven-day arc of a JAM. Container-building opens the week. Trust and reflection build through the middle. The heaviest work (Truth Mandala, Class-Race, Gender Day) sits late, after the container can hold it. The closing arc lands what the week opened.</figcaption>
</figure>
**Setting context.** Opening announcements, setting intentions, secret angels, sacred connections, appreciation cards, meal blessings, the altar ceremony. The opening evening is dense with frame-setting and ritual. Participants are told the agreements, name what they hope for, and enter the container.
**Building community.** Check-in (large circle, four minutes each, watch passed), check-in groups (small groups for nightly reflection), two-minute introductions, listening exercises, community labor, shoulder massage. Days two and three.
**Team-building games and energizers.** Bunny Bunny, Pass the Clap, Human Knots, Falling Trust, Whoosh Ball, Giants Wizards Elves, and dozens more. These are not warm-ups. The manual treats them as serious work. Embodied trust is the substrate for everything else.
**Reflection and development.** Free writing, Tree of Life, River of Life, Self Image, Deep Sharing with a Good Friend, Different Game, If You Really Knew Me, Living Your Dreams. Mid-week. Partner sharing intensifies. Participants begin to be seen.
**Co-learning and dialogue.** Open Space Technology, World Café, Truth Mandala, Conflict Resolution Exercise, Cross Cultural Exchange. Mid-to-late week. Group-mind practices, grief work, and structured conflict work.
**Race, class, gender, and power.** The Heart Exercise, the Class-Race Exercise, Racism Stand-up, Gender Day, Money Secrets, intersectional analysis. Late in the week, once trust is real enough to hold the material.
**Taking it home, moving forward.** Speeches with feedback, the Momentum Process, Commitment Circle, Goal Setting, Forgiveness Exercise, Closing Check-in, Appreciation Circle. The last two days. The container closes by helping people land what they are taking back.
### Seven ingredients (from the manual)
The manual lists seven ingredients that have to be present for a JAM to work:
1. Safe, supportive, and beautiful physical environment.
2. Solid logistics for food, accommodation, and transportation.
3. Carefully selected participants based on commitment to internal, interpersonal, and systemic change.
4. Capable facilitators, with their own qualities documented in the next section of the manual.
5. A trusting relationship and good teamwork among the facilitators.
6. Relevant and provocative content and processes.
7. A few carefully selected guest presenters or elders.
The manual is explicit that ingredient five is not optional. A JAM rises and falls on whether the facilitator team is itself a healthy group. If the facilitators are not in good relationship, the participants will sense it before the week is half over and the container will not hold.
### Qualities of a JAM facilitator
The manual names what makes a person able to hold this kind of work. The list is worth quoting in compressed form. A JAM facilitator has an open heart, mind, and spirit and can listen without judgement. Has everyone's back; does not take sides or sort people. Can communicate boundaries and concerns without shaming people. Can read group dynamics and feel what is emerging. Can support and lead without controlling outcomes. Is in touch with their own emotional and spiritual process and can choose how and when to share it. Knows their own edges and can work them in front of the group without collapsing.
The facilitator is a participant, not a host. The manual is clear: do not remain aloof, enter the work as honestly as you can.
## What it is and what it is not
The framing here matters because the JAM is often confused with adjacent formats that look similar from the outside.
A JAM is built around a small fixed scale. The manual names 30 people inclusive of organisers and facilitators as the ideal size. Larger gatherings can use JAM practices but do not produce the same depth. A 200-person convergence using JAM-style check-ins is doing something else.
A JAM is residential and week-long. The arc of the practices assumes seven days in which trust can deepen, edges can come up, and grief can be held. A weekend retreat using the same toolkit will get most of the relational opening but very little of the harder material.
A JAM works alongside training, organising, and movement-building. It does not replace them. The manual is direct that JAMs are not the heart of the global youth movement; the hope is many hearts, many hands, many entry points. A participant goes home and continues their work; the JAM does not become the work.
A JAM is selective. The selection is part of the design, not an artefact of capacity. The manual sits openly with the question of whether the selection is exclusionary. The honest answer is yes, and the programme is in ongoing inquiry about that.
A JAM pairs well with the Work That Reconnects (Joanna Macy's tradition, from which the Truth Mandala comes), with Council practice (the Ojai Foundation tradition), and with Open Space Technology (Harrison Owen). The toolkit borrows from each. ToGather already documents [Open Space Technology](/library/open-space-technology) and [World Café](/library/world-cafe-brown-isaacs) as standalone entries.
## Communities and movements drawing on the JAM tradition
A JAM is a programme, not a community in residence, so the community-cards format for this entry runs slightly differently than for a practice rooted in a single home community. The entries below describe the organisations and lineages that have hosted JAMs or built closely related programmes.
**YES! (Youth Empowerment Seminars).** Santa Cruz, California, founded 1990. Ocean Robbins co-directed YES! for two decades alongside Shilpa Jain and a rotating facilitator team. YES! ran the World Jam and the Leveraging Privilege for Social Change Jam programmes. The 2010 manual consolidates the practices developed across that period. YES! later reorganised; the JAM lineage continues in adjacent programmes.
**Shikshantar (Udaipur, India).** Shilpa Jain's home institute. Shikshantar runs unschooling and grassroots-learning gatherings that share the JAM lineage in form: small, relational, slow, ritualised. Manish Jain, named in the manual's acknowledgements, is a Shikshantar co-founder.
**Bolder Giving and Resource Generation.** Two U.S. networks named in the manual's acknowledgements that ran related week-long gatherings for young people with class privilege, working on what the JAM toolkit calls Money Secrets. The Leveraging Privilege for Social Change Jam emerged from this lineage.
**The Work That Reconnects.** Joanna Macy's tradition, named in the manual's acknowledgements through Macy herself. The Truth Mandala, which is central to the JAM week, originates in this tradition and is documented in Macy and Brown's *Coming Back to Life*. JAMs are one of several lineages that carry the practice.
> **FROM THE FIELD**
> Across the communities the ToGather archive does document, the practices that land are often the small ones: a check-in circle that becomes the daily heartbeat, a partner sharing protocol that gives a couple of friends the language to say what they could not say before, a closing appreciation circle that gives the week a frame. The JAM method's gift is that it puts the small practices inside a week-long container that lets them go deeper than a workshop would. Communities looking at the JAM should look first at what scale they can hold, not what curriculum they want to teach.
## How to begin practicing this in your own group
**1. Test for fit.** Before running a JAM, ask whether your group actually needs a week-long, 30-person, residential, selective container. Most groups need something else first: a better check-in, a partner sharing practice, a working conflict process. The JAM is a high-investment format. Use it when the smaller pieces are already part of the rhythm.
**2. Train inside an existing programme.** The manual is explicit about this. The JAM is hard to learn from reading the manual. Participate in a JAM run by experienced facilitators before you facilitate one. The manual's closing note says: "We hope it will be of value to others as well, but take no responsibility for the results of using these exercises without prior coaching from YES!"
**3. Start with one practice, not the week.** Take one practice from the manual (the check-in, the appreciation circle, the Heart Exercise, the Truth Mandala) and run it inside your existing group rhythm. Let the practice prove itself over months before you attempt to assemble the week.
**4. Invest in the facilitator team.** The seventh ingredient in the manual is a trusting facilitator team. A two-or-three-person facilitator team needs months of preparation together, not days. The team has to be able to hold conflict between themselves without the group seeing it leak into the work. If your facilitator team is new, run a shorter pilot before the full week.
**5. The companion practice.** The Truth Mandala (see the [Truth Mandala](/library/truth-mandala) Library entry) is the practice most often singled out by JAM participants as the moment the week changed for them. It pairs with the JAM as the inner-work practice that opens the rest. The manual treats the two as separable but always close.
**6. The reckoning.** Most groups that attempt to run a JAM-style gathering hit the same wall in years two or three: the second cohort is harder to recruit, the facilitator team has shifted, the original conditions that made the first one work cannot be reproduced. The honest path is to treat the JAM as a programme rather than a one-off. Investment in lineage, mentorship, and facilitator development is what makes the format last.
## Living examples and entry points for community builders
The JAM lineage is alive today in several adjacent forms. None of them call themselves JAMs, but the design is recognisable.
**The Work That Reconnects network.** Active globally, running retreats in the Joanna Macy lineage. The Truth Mandala and other grief practices are central. See [workthatreconnects.org](https://workthatreconnects.org). A WTR week-long is the closest contemporary heir to the inner-work side of the JAM.
**Resource Generation and Class Action.** Active in the United States, running residential gatherings for young people with class privilege. The Money Secrets and Class-Race exercises in the JAM manual share lineage with this network. See [resourcegeneration.org](https://resourcegeneration.org).
**Shikshantar and Swaraj University.** Active in Udaipur, India, running unschooling and grassroots-learning gatherings in a lineage shared with the JAM. Manish Jain co-founded both. See [swarajuniversity.org](https://swarajuniversity.org).
**Art of Hosting communities.** Active globally. Open Space and World Café (both in the JAM toolkit) sit at the centre of Art of Hosting trainings. Many JAM facilitators move between the two lineages. See [artofhosting.org](https://artofhosting.org).
Adjacent or inspired applications include: residential cohort programmes for community organisers (Wildfire, the Highlander Center's continuing education programmes), grief-tending retreats in the Francis Weller lineage, and the Bioneers Youth Leadership Programme.
Entry points for someone building a community:
- Read the [YES! Activities Facilitation Manual](https://yesworld.org) (the source for this entry) before deciding whether to attempt the form.
- Find a Work That Reconnects facilitator near you and attend a weekend. The Truth Mandala alone is worth the trip and most JAM facilitators name it as the centre of their week.
- Sit with the question of selection. If your community thinks of itself as open, the JAM's deliberate selectivity will be the first hard conversation. The manual is honest that it has not solved this; it has chosen it.
- Run a single practice for six months. Check-ins are the cheapest test. If the practice does not take, the week will not take either.
- If you are considering hosting, find a co-facilitator who is more experienced than you. The seventh ingredient is real.
**One caution.** The JAM toolkit borrows from many lineages. Several of the most-loved practices, including the Truth Mandala and parts of the appreciation work, come from teachers (Joanna Macy, Lillie Allen) whose names appear in the manual's acknowledgements but whose lineages deserve to be approached on their own terms before being assembled into a one-week container. Lifting the practice without the lineage thins it. Where you can, learn the practice from inside its home tradition first.
## Where it gets hard
**The selection problem.** The JAM works because the participants meet a threshold: existing community work, openness to challenge, capacity for week-long residential commitment. That threshold is also a wall. The manual sits openly with the question and does not resolve it. Communities considering the format inherit the question. There is no universal version.
**The travel and cost problem.** Week-long residential gatherings in nice venues are expensive. The manual notes that JAMs have run with sliding-scale fees and scholarships, but most participants need to be able to afford flights, take a week off work, and have the passport infrastructure to cross borders. The format embeds class assumptions in its logistics.
**The facilitator cost.** Holding 30 people through Truth Mandala, Gender Day, and the Class-Race Exercise inside a week is a real cost on the facilitator team. The manual names burnout among facilitators as a real pattern. Several long-time YES! facilitators have written about needing recovery time after JAMs. The format runs hot.
**The transmission gap.** Reading the manual is easy. Holding a JAM is hard. The skill is in the room, not on the page. The manual itself says so. The transmission gap is the largest single risk for any group attempting to import the format from text.
**Cultural assumptions in the toolkit.** The manual was written for a primarily U.S. and English-speaking audience. The statistics in the Race, Class, Gender, and Power section are U.S.-centric. The framing of trust, intimacy, and disclosure assumes a cultural register where week-long emotional openness with relative strangers is something a participant can do. Communities outside that register need to adapt. The manual invites adaptation but does not script it.
**The week-after.** A JAM ends, and the participants go home. The format does not produce a structure for what happens afterwards. The manual gestures at this in the Commitment Circle and Goal Setting exercises but is honest that the integration is the participants' own work, sometimes harder than the week itself.
## More resources
**Canonical primary sources.**
- *YES! Activities Facilitation Manual for Young Changemakers* (2010). The source for this entry. The manual is the consolidated record of 20 years of YES! events.
- The YES! organisation website at [yesworld.org](https://yesworld.org).
- Ocean Robbins's founder essay at the beginning of the manual.
- Shilpa Jain and Tad Hargrave's "What Is a JAM?" essay (first chapter of the manual).
**Trainings and lineages.**
- The [Work That Reconnects network](https://workthatreconnects.org) for the Truth Mandala lineage.
- [Art of Hosting](https://artofhosting.org) for Open Space and World Café.
- [Shikshantar](https://shikshantar.org) for the Shilpa Jain lineage.
**Theoretical lineage.**
- Joanna Macy and Molly Young Brown, *Coming Back to Life* (the canonical Truth Mandala source).
- Marshall Ganz, public narrative and organising lineage (named in the manual's acknowledgements).
- Paul Kivel, *Uprooting Racism* (the source for the Heart Exercise and the Class-Race Exercise).
- Lillie Allen, Be Present model (named in the manual's acknowledgements).
**Companion frameworks.**
- [Truth Mandala](/library/truth-mandala) (the inner-work practice at the centre of the JAM week).
- [Setting the Container at a JAM](/library/setting-the-container-jam) (opening ritual stack).
- [The Daily Check-In Practice](/library/daily-check-in-practice) (the morning round that anchors the week).
- [Deep Partner Sharing](/library/deep-partner-sharing) (the relational protocols at the heart of the week).
- [Class-Race Stand-Up and the Heart Exercise](/library/class-race-stand-up) (the power and privilege embodied practices).
- [Gender Day at a JAM](/library/gender-day-jam) (the day-long gender container).
- [Closing and Commitment Cycle](/library/closing-commitment-cycle) (the practices that land the week).
- [Open Space Technology](/library/open-space-technology) (already in the Library; used inside JAMs as a participant-led dialogue container).
- [World Café](/library/world-cafe-brown-isaacs) (already in the Library; also used inside JAMs).
- [Tamera Forum](/library/tamera-forum) (a sister practice from a different lineage; both use a held container for honest speech).
**From the ToGather archive.** No archive interview to date documents a JAM directly. The closest material is the grief-work and conflict-process material in the Tamera interviews, the council-style check-in material across the Auroville interviews, and the partner-sharing material in several Israeli kibbutz interviews. Links will be added as JAM-adjacent material is identified.