Liberating Structures (Lipmanowicz & McCandless, 2014)

Details

Category: Toolkits
Access: public

Description

An open Creative Commons library of 33 named facilitation methods developed by Henri Lipmanowicz and Keith McCandless and incubated at the Plexus Institute. Each method is defined by the same five design elements (Structuring Invitation, Space and Materials, Participation Distribution, Group Configuration, Sequence and Time) and is designed to be picked up and used by anyone, not only by trained facilitators. The motto: including and unleashing everyone.

Full text

## 1. What the toolkit is

Liberating Structures, written LS, is an open, Creative Commons library of 33 named facilitation methods. The rule is one sentence. The way a meeting is structured shapes who speaks, who is heard, and what becomes possible; if you change the structure, you change the meeting.

The canonical short definition comes from the authors' own framing: "Liberating Structures are easy-to-learn microstructures that enhance relational coordination and trust. They quickly foster lively participation in groups of any size, making it possible to truly include and unleash everyone." (The verb the authors use throughout is *unleash*, and the central design move is *including everyone* through structures that distribute voice rather than concentrate it.)

The toolkit fits a particular kind of facilitator. One who has noticed that the five conventional ways most meetings run (presentations, managed discussions, open discussions, status reports, brainstorms) produce thin participation, predictable outcomes, and the exhaustion of always hearing from the same three people. One who wants a small alternative to each of those conventional structures rather than a complete methodology to displace them. One who is willing to memorise a handful of small, modular, named structures and combine them as needed.

LS is a *pattern library*, not a methodology. It does not prescribe an arc, a sequence, or a session length. Each of the 33 structures takes 10 to 90 minutes and is designed to be used singly or in combination ("strings"). A facilitator might run 1-2-4-All to open a meeting, follow with 9 Whys to clarify purpose, then run Wise Crowds for peer consultation on a specific question, and close with What, So What, Now What? for harvest and commitment. The same facilitator might run none of these at the next meeting because the question demands a different structure.

Every Liberating Structure is built and implemented with the same five design elements: a *Structuring Invitation* (the question or request that frames the purpose), *Space and Materials* (how the physical setting and props are arranged), *Participation Distribution* (how time and voice are distributed among participants), *Group Configuration* (how people are grouped and re-grouped), and *Sequence and Steps with Time Allocation* (the procedural form). The five elements are the conceptual scaffolding underneath the 33 named methods, and they are also the design grammar a facilitator uses to invent new structures or adapt existing ones.

LS belongs to the wider family of participatory methods that includes Open Space Technology, World Café, Circle, ProAction Café, Theory U, and Appreciative Inquiry. Among them, LS is the most modular and the smallest-grained. Where an AI Summit takes 2-to-4 days and a World Café takes 90 minutes, individual Liberating Structures take 10 to 60 minutes and slot inside any larger format. Facilitators in the Art of Hosting and dialogic OD traditions routinely use LS structures inside the larger AoH containers; LS practitioners routinely use AoH methods alongside their LS repertoire.

<figure>
<svg viewBox="0 0 700 470" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="max-width:660px; display:block; margin:24px auto; background:#fcfaf5;">
<text x="350" y="26" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="13" fill="#857e72" font-style="italic">Every Liberating Structure is defined by the same five design elements.</text>
<text x="350" y="56" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="12" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">FIVE DESIGN ELEMENTS</text>
<rect x="28" y="70" width="120" height="150" rx="6" fill="#ffffff" stroke="#5d4f3a" stroke-width="1.5"/>
<text x="88" y="93" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#c97e4f" font-weight="600">1</text>
<text x="88" y="113" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">Structuring</text>
<text x="88" y="127" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">Invitation</text>
<text x="88" y="156" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">The question</text>
<text x="88" y="170" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">or request that</text>
<text x="88" y="184" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">frames purpose</text>
<rect x="159" y="70" width="120" height="150" rx="6" fill="#ffffff" stroke="#5d4f3a" stroke-width="1.5"/>
<text x="219" y="93" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#c97e4f" font-weight="600">2</text>
<text x="219" y="113" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">Space &</text>
<text x="219" y="127" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">Materials</text>
<text x="219" y="156" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">How the room</text>
<text x="219" y="170" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">and props</text>
<text x="219" y="184" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">are set up</text>
<rect x="290" y="70" width="120" height="150" rx="6" fill="#ffffff" stroke="#5d4f3a" stroke-width="1.5"/>
<text x="350" y="93" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#c97e4f" font-weight="600">3</text>
<text x="350" y="113" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">Participation</text>
<text x="350" y="127" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">Distribution</text>
<text x="350" y="156" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">How time</text>
<text x="350" y="170" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">and voice are</text>
<text x="350" y="184" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">distributed</text>
<rect x="421" y="70" width="120" height="150" rx="6" fill="#ffffff" stroke="#5d4f3a" stroke-width="1.5"/>
<text x="481" y="93" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#c97e4f" font-weight="600">4</text>
<text x="481" y="113" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">Group</text>
<text x="481" y="127" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">Configuration</text>
<text x="481" y="156" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">How people</text>
<text x="481" y="170" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">are grouped</text>
<text x="481" y="184" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">and re-grouped</text>
<rect x="552" y="70" width="120" height="150" rx="6" fill="#ffffff" stroke="#5d4f3a" stroke-width="1.5"/>
<text x="612" y="93" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#c97e4f" font-weight="600">5</text>
<text x="612" y="113" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">Sequence</text>
<text x="612" y="127" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="11" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">& Time</text>
<text x="612" y="156" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">The steps</text>
<text x="612" y="170" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">and time</text>
<text x="612" y="184" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">for each</text>
<line x1="60" y1="246" x2="640" y2="246" stroke="#e6dfd0" stroke-width="1"/>
<text x="350" y="268" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="12" fill="#5d4f3a" font-weight="600">A sample from the 33-method menu</text>
<rect x="34" y="282" width="200" height="65" rx="6" fill="#f7f1e3" stroke="#5d4f3a" stroke-width="1.5"/>
<text x="134" y="304" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="12" fill="#c97e4f" font-weight="600">1. 1-2-4-All</text>
<text x="134" y="322" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">Engage everyone simultaneously</text>
<text x="134" y="335" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">in generating questions and ideas</text>
<rect x="250" y="282" width="200" height="65" rx="6" fill="#f7f1e3" stroke="#5d4f3a" stroke-width="1.5"/>
<text x="350" y="304" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="12" fill="#c97e4f" font-weight="600">8. Troika Consulting</text>
<text x="350" y="322" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">Three-person peer coaching</text>
<text x="350" y="335" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">in round-robin format</text>
<rect x="466" y="282" width="200" height="65" rx="6" fill="#f7f1e3" stroke="#5d4f3a" stroke-width="1.5"/>
<text x="566" y="304" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="12" fill="#c97e4f" font-weight="600">13. Wise Crowds</text>
<text x="566" y="322" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">Tap collective wisdom of</text>
<text x="566" y="335" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">groups of four or five at a time</text>
<rect x="34" y="362" width="200" height="65" rx="6" fill="#f7f1e3" stroke="#5d4f3a" stroke-width="1.5"/>
<text x="134" y="384" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="12" fill="#c97e4f" font-weight="600">3. 9 Whys</text>
<text x="134" y="402" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">Make purpose explicit</text>
<text x="134" y="415" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">through paired interviews</text>
<rect x="250" y="362" width="200" height="65" rx="6" fill="#f7f1e3" stroke="#5d4f3a" stroke-width="1.5"/>
<text x="350" y="384" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="12" fill="#c97e4f" font-weight="600">14. Min Specs</text>
<text x="350" y="402" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">Specify only the absolute</text>
<text x="350" y="415" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">must-dos and must-not-dos</text>
<rect x="466" y="362" width="200" height="65" rx="6" fill="#f7f1e3" stroke="#5d4f3a" stroke-width="1.5"/>
<text x="566" y="384" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="12" fill="#c97e4f" font-weight="600">6. TRIZ</text>
<text x="566" y="402" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">Make space for innovation by</text>
<text x="566" y="415" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="9" fill="#857e72">imagining the worst result</text>
<text x="350" y="455" text-anchor="middle" font-family="Georgia, serif" font-size="10" fill="#857e72" font-style="italic">Including and unleashing everyone. Lipmanowicz & McCandless, 2014.</text>
</svg>
<figcaption style="text-align:center; font-style:italic; color:#857e72; font-size:13px; margin-top:8px;">The Liberating Structures grammar: every one of the 33 named methods is defined by the same five design elements (top), and the 33 form a modular menu that facilitators combine into strings for specific use cases (bottom: 6 of the 33).</figcaption>
</figure>

---

## 2. Where it came from and who maintains it

Liberating Structures has a clear two-person authorship and a documented incubation network.

**Keith McCandless and the healthcare-quality lineage.** Keith McCandless is the practitioner half of the partnership. Before LS, he founded and served as executive director of the Foundation for Health Care Quality in Seattle, which brought business, academic, and health leaders into partnerships to improve quality and value in healthcare. From 1992 to 2000, he led executive learning initiatives at the Health Forum in San Francisco, working with field-based learning collaboratives focused on quality management, systems thinking, rapid prototyping, and transformational leadership. The healthcare-quality lineage matters because many of the early Liberating Structures were developed in healthcare contexts, where the cost of conventional meeting structures (in clinician time, in patient outcomes, in safety) was unusually visible.

**Henri Lipmanowicz and the corporate-leadership lineage.** Henri Lipmanowicz is the corporate-leadership half of the partnership. Before LS, he served as President of Merck Intercontinental and Japan, with responsibility for Merck's pharmaceutical operations across Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. He retired in 2000 and turned his attention to complexity science and organizational change. His perspective on what makes meetings fail (and on what executives can be persuaded to try instead) shaped the LS framing from the start.

**Plexus Institute, the incubator.** The two met while serving on the Scientific Advisory Board of the Plexus Institute, a nonprofit organization focused on applying complexity science to healthcare, public health, and community development. Plexus Institute was the institutional home of the LS work for over a decade, hosting documentation, training events, and the early online community. The two co-developers began their formal partnership in the early 2000s after sharing a hunch (their phrase) that complexity science had practical applications and could be accessible to everyone.

**The 2014 book.** *The Surprising Power of Liberating Structures: Simple Rules to Unleash a Culture of Innovation*, copyright 2013 and published February 2014 by Liberating Structures Press, is the canonical reference. The book has four parts: Part 1 introduces the problem with conventional meeting structures; Part 2 introduces the LS approach and the five design elements; Part 3 describes how to use LS in practice; Part 4 is the field guide with step-by-step explanations of all 33 structures. The book is intentionally a manual rather than a manifesto.

**The Creative Commons licensing.** All 33 Liberating Structures are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. Liberatingstructures.com is the canonical online repository, with each of the 33 methods documented at the same level of detail as in the book, freely available, translated by volunteers into many languages, and continuously refined by the practitioner community.

**The User Group network.** Local Liberating Structures User Groups have formed in cities around the world, organized through liberatingstructures.com and meetup.com. Each group meets monthly or quarterly to practice the methods together. The User Group format is itself a Liberating Structure: a peer practice community without paid instructors, where members learn by running structures on each other.

**Conferences and intensives.** The annual Liberating Structures Global Gathering, held in various cities since the mid-2010s, is the practitioner community's primary place of mutual learning. Multi-day immersion workshops are also offered by McCandless, Lipmanowicz, and various trained facilitators in many countries. The training cost is generally lower than for Art of Hosting trainings of comparable depth, reflecting the LS ethic of accessibility.

**Continued stewardship.** McCandless and Lipmanowicz have both remained active practitioners and ambassadors for the work through the 2010s and into the 2020s, with the practitioner community gradually taking on more of the development and adaptation. The work continues to expand through user-led additions to the canon (new structures occasionally graduate from local user groups into the official 33) and through application in new sectors (climate work, racial justice, urban planning, refugee response).

---

## 3. What's inside

The 33 named Liberating Structures fall into rough functional categories. The list below groups them by purpose, with the number from the canonical menu and a one-sentence description.

**Quick engagement (structures for opening or warming a room).**

- 1-2-4-All. Individual reflection becomes pairs, then quartets, then plenary. Engages everyone simultaneously in generating questions and ideas. The most-used LS by far, the entry point most facilitators learn first.
- Impromptu Networking. Three rounds of 2-minute one-on-one introductions on the same prompt. Builds shared understanding fast at the opening of any gathering.
- Nine Whys. Paired interviews that surface deep purpose through repeated "why does that matter to you?" questions. Five minutes per pair.

**Peer-to-peer consulting (structures for getting and giving help).**

- Troika Consulting. Three chairs, knee-to-knee, no table. One person asks for help, two consult, rotation continues until each has been the asker. The deepest peer-coaching form in the LS menu.
- Wise Crowds. Small groups of four or five give consultation to one person at a time. Works at any scale from 4 to 100+ participants in parallel groups.
- 15% Solutions. Surface and focus on what each person can do without additional resources or permission. The most action-oriented LS.

**Purpose and direction (structures for clarifying intent).**

- 9 Whys. Paired interviews on purpose.
- Min Specs. Specify only the absolute must-dos and must-not-dos for a given activity. Replaces over-detailed planning with intentional minimalism.
- Purpose-to-Practice (P2P). A multi-step process to design a complete initiative around five elements: purpose, principles, participants, structure, practices.

**Innovation and creativity (structures for unsticking thinking).**

- TRIZ. Make space for innovation by imagining the worst possible result, then list what current behaviour is contributing to that worst result. Counterintuitive and unusually effective.
- Improv Prototyping. Develop solutions through repeated low-fidelity prototyping in front of the rest of the group. Drawn from theatre improvisation.
- Discovery & Action Dialogue (DAD). Surface, discover, and spread positive deviance practices within a group facing a shared problem. Healthcare origin.

**Sense-making and harvest (structures for processing and committing).**

- What, So What, Now What? (W³). A three-stage debrief that moves from observations to interpretations to action. The default LS for closing any gathering.
- Conversation Café. A structured table conversation in 4 rounds. Sister to World Café, smaller-grained.
- Drawing Together. Use simple visual language to make sense together. Particularly useful when groups have hit the limits of verbal articulation.

**Strategy and complexity (structures for navigating uncertainty).**

- Critical Uncertainties. Surface the most consequential unknowns about the future and develop strategies that hold up across multiple scenarios. Used for long-horizon planning.
- Ecocycle Planning. Map every activity and project the group is running onto a four-phase cycle (creation, maturity, creative destruction, renewal). Reveals what to keep, what to release, what to start.
- Open Space Technology. Yes, this is in the LS menu. The Owen 1985 method (covered in its own Library entry) is one of the 33 structures, demonstrating that LS is happy to borrow from sister methods rather than reinvent them.

**Strings and combinations.** The book and the online repository document over 100 named *strings* (sequences of 2 to 5 structures combined for a specific use case). Examples: "Critical Uncertainties + Wise Crowds + 15% Solutions" for stress-tested strategy; "9 Whys + Min Specs + W³" for a full purpose-to-action cycle in 90 minutes. Strings are the LS practitioner's working vocabulary.

The full menu is documented at liberatingstructures.com with the same five-design-element template for each: Structuring Invitation, Space and Materials, Participation Distribution, Group Configuration, Sequence and Steps with Time Allocation. Reading three or four entries from the menu side by side reveals how the five elements compose into different functional behaviours.

---

## 4. How it is typically used

LS is unusual among facilitation toolkits in that it is designed to be picked up and used by anyone, not only by trained facilitators. The authors' explicit ambition is that "every meeting in every organization can be transformed by including everyone." The typical adoption pattern, observed across thousands of practitioners, is the following arc.

**Stage 1: One structure inside an existing meeting.** A practitioner reads the book or the online menu, picks 1-2-4-All as the gentlest entry point, and inserts it into a meeting they are already going to hold. Twelve minutes, no special equipment, no announcement that this is a "new method." The participants notice that more voices spoke than usual. The practitioner notices that the energy is different.

**Stage 2: A small repertoire of three to five structures.** Over a few months, the practitioner adds Impromptu Networking (for openings), Troika Consulting (for peer coaching), What/So What/Now What (for closings), and 9 Whys (for purpose). These five structures plus 1-2-4-All cover most common facilitator needs and can be combined into useful strings.

**Stage 3: Strings and intentional design.** The practitioner begins to design meetings around strings rather than around individual structures. The shift is from "I will use 1-2-4-All today" to "Today's question needs purpose-then-consultation-then-commitment, so I will run 9 Whys → Troika Consulting → 15% Solutions." Designing meetings around strings is the practitioner-level mark of LS fluency.

**Stage 4: Adaptation and invention.** The practitioner starts adapting existing structures to their context, and eventually invents new structures using the five-design-element grammar. Some practitioner-invented structures eventually graduate to the official 33, though the canon has remained stable since 2014.

**Typical use cases observed.**

- *Team meetings* run weekly or biweekly, with one or two LS structures replacing the conventional discussion format.
- *Strategic planning* run as multi-day workshops combining 6 to 10 LS structures in strings.
- *Healthcare quality-improvement work*, the historical home of LS, where DAD, TRIZ, and Wise Crowds are commonly used in clinician learning collaboratives.
- *Educational reform processes*, where LS combines with Theory U or Appreciative Inquiry for whole-system change in school districts.
- *Innovation and product development*, where Improv Prototyping, Critical Uncertainties, and Ecocycle Planning are the most-used structures.
- *Community organizing and movement work*, where LS provides a more egalitarian alternative to conventional meeting structures.
- *International development and humanitarian response*, where the modularity of LS lets local practitioners use the methods without long professional development arcs.

**What LS replaces in practice.** The book is explicit about the comparison: LS is designed to replace or complement the five conventional structures most organizations use (presentations, managed discussions, open discussions, status reports, brainstorms). Each of those conventional structures has predictable failure modes (presentation: only the presenter speaks; managed discussion: only senior people speak; brainstorm: production blocking and groupthink). The LS structures are each designed to address one of those failure modes specifically.

**What LS does not replace.** LS does not replace deep relational work (Forum, Circle, NVC), strategic visioning (Theory U, AI Summit), or operational governance (Sociocracy 3.0, consent decision-making). LS structures can sit inside any of those, but they do not substitute for them. The honest framing of an experienced LS practitioner is that LS is the small-grained vocabulary that makes the larger containers work better, not the larger container itself.

---

## 5. Communities and organizations using it

LS has spread widely enough that documented deployments span sectors, continents, and group sizes. A non-exhaustive sample, drawn from primary sources.

**Healthcare.** The historical home of LS. The Foundation for Health Care Quality (where McCandless served as founding executive director), the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), the Plexus Institute, and many regional health systems use LS for clinician learning collaboratives, patient safety initiatives, and quality-improvement work. DAD (Discovery & Action Dialogue) was developed specifically in healthcare contexts to surface positive deviance among clinicians.

**Tech and product development.** The Liberators (a Dutch consultancy by Christiaan Verwijs and Barry Overeem) have published extensively on using LS within Scrum and Agile contexts. Many product teams use Troika Consulting and Wise Crowds for peer coaching, and 1-2-4-All as a default opener for retrospectives.

**Higher education and law.** The S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah has run LS sessions for faculty development, framing them as "change methods for everybody every day." Similar adoption is documented at university teaching centers across North America and Europe.

**The Liberating Structures Global Gathering, held in various cities since the mid-2010s.** The largest practitioner gathering, with hundreds of attendees from many countries, run entirely using LS structures. The format itself is the demonstration.

**Local Liberating Structures User Groups.** Documented user groups exist in many cities including Seattle, New York, Boston, San Francisco, Portland, Toronto, Montreal, London, Amsterdam, Berlin, Helsinki, Stockholm, Lisbon, Madrid, Singapore, Hong Kong, and several Latin American cities. Each group meets monthly or quarterly to practice the methods together. The user group network is the closest thing in the LS world to a community of practice in the Art of Hosting sense.

**International development and humanitarian response.** Plexus Institute has documented LS use in public health and community-development projects in Niger, Ethiopia, Pakistan, Nepal, and many other contexts. The methods travel well into low-resource settings because they require minimal equipment, no licensed software, and no professional facilitator certification.

**Government and public sector.** The U.S. federal government and various state and municipal governments in North America have used LS for civic engagement, policy design, and inter-agency coordination work. The UK Cabinet Office Behavioural Insights Team and the U.S. White House Innovation Fellows have both documented LS use in their work.

**Academic recognition.** A chapter on Liberating Structures appears in the *Elgar Encyclopedia of Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity* (2024), positioning LS as one of the canonical methods for cross-disciplinary collaboration in academic and applied settings.

The pattern across these deployments: LS travels well into contexts where conventional meeting structures have produced enough fatigue that an alternative is welcome, where the participants are willing to try something unfamiliar for 15 minutes, and where the facilitator is committed to following the structure rather than improvising mid-way. It travels less well into contexts where the existing power structure benefits from conventional meetings (presenter-as-authority, senior-as-only-voice) and resists the redistribution of participation.

> **From the field.** No archive interview names Liberating Structures directly. The toolkit lives in the corporate, healthcare, and tech-team world rather than in the residential-community world the ToGather archive covers. The closest archive grounding is indirect. Sharon's March 2026 brief "Art of Hosting and Open Space, for tomorrow" positions LS inside the wider AoH lineage the archive is engaging with through the Feytopia, TDF, Tamera, and Auroville interviews; the AoH cluster of Library entries (Open Space Technology, World Café, ProAction Café, Circle, Appreciative Inquiry, Theory U) frames the larger containers that LS structures sit inside. As of 2026, no community in the ToGather archive has explicitly adopted LS as a named practice. The methods would slot cleanly into the existing facilitation rhythms at Feytopia and TDF, where weekly group sessions already use AoH-family structures, but the named adoption is not there.

---

## 6. How to begin using it in your own community

Six steps. Verb-first.

**1. Read the LS Menu online before you do anything else.** liberatingstructures.com/ls-menu/. Free, fully documented, continuously updated. Twenty minutes of browsing reveals what LS is and is not. Pick three structures that match your most common meeting types and read them in detail. Note the five-design-element template; it is the same for every structure.

**2. Run 1-2-4-All in your next meeting.** Twelve minutes. No special prep, no announcement, no permission needed, no licensed facilitator required. Open with a real question, give participants a minute alone, then two minutes in pairs, then four minutes in quartets, then plenary. Watch what happens to participation. This is the canonical first move into LS practice and the single most useful experiment you can run.

**3. Add three to five structures over the next three months.** Once 1-2-4-All is in your repertoire, add Impromptu Networking (for openings), Troika Consulting (for peer coaching), What/So What/Now What (for closings), and 9 Whys (for purpose). These five plus 1-2-4-All cover most common facilitator needs. Run each one at least twice before moving to the next.

**4. Buy the book and read it cover to cover.** *The Surprising Power of Liberating Structures* (Lipmanowicz and McCandless, 2014) is the canonical reference. Read Part 1 (the problem with conventional structures) and Part 2 (the five design elements) first. Part 4 (the field guide for all 33 structures) only after you have run two or three structures yourself, so the procedural descriptions land in lived experience rather than abstraction.

**5. Practice strings rather than single structures.** Once you have run five or six structures, start designing meetings around strings. The shift from "I will use 1-2-4-All today" to "Today's question needs purpose-then-consultation-then-commitment, so I will run 9 Whys → Troika Consulting → 15% Solutions" is where LS becomes a generative practice rather than a tool kit. The book and the online repository document over 100 named strings; the website's "Sample Strings" page is a good starting point.

**6. Find or start a local LS User Group.** Many cities have a Liberating Structures User Group that meets monthly. Find yours through liberatingstructures.com or meetup.com. If your city does not have one, the LS website has a guide for starting one. The User Group format is itself a Liberating Structure: peer practice without paid instructors, where members learn by running structures on each other. Three months of monthly user group practice will deepen your fluency faster than any reading.

**One caution.** LS is unusually easy to do badly. The methods look simple on the page; running them well requires discipline that book reading alone does not produce. The most common failure mode is the facilitator who shortens the time allocations, mixes structures together without intention, or skips the structuring invitation. Follow the timing. Read the structuring invitation aloud verbatim from the book. Trust the form. The form is the method.

---

## 7. Living examples and entry points for community builders

Where LS is alive in 2026, and how to engage with it beyond your own first experiments.

### Living examples

**The Liberating Structures Global Gathering** (rotating cities since the mid-2010s). The largest practitioner gathering, run entirely using LS structures, with hundreds of attendees from many countries. The format itself is the demonstration. Worth attending once if you can.

**Local LS User Groups** in 20+ cities worldwide (Seattle, New York, Boston, San Francisco, Portland, Toronto, Montreal, London, Amsterdam, Berlin, Helsinki, Stockholm, Lisbon, Madrid, Singapore, Hong Kong, and several Latin American cities). Each meets monthly or quarterly to practice the methods together. The user group network is the most accessible practitioner community in the LS world.

**Healthcare quality-improvement programs**, where LS originated. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), the Foundation for Health Care Quality, and many regional health systems run clinician learning collaboratives using DAD, TRIZ, and Wise Crowds. Many of the early case studies in the LS book come from this context.

**The Liberators blog and the Agile / Scrum practitioner community** (medium.com/the-liberators). Christiaan Verwijs and Barry Overeem have published extensively on using LS within software-team contexts. Their work is the easiest entry point for tech-team practitioners.

**International development and humanitarian response.** The Plexus Institute has documented LS use in public health and community-development projects in Niger, Ethiopia, Pakistan, Nepal, and many other contexts. The methods travel well into low-resource settings because they require minimal equipment, no licensed software, and no professional facilitator certification.

### Adjacent applications

**Art of Hosting practitioners** routinely use LS structures inside larger AoH containers. A 4-hour AoH session might use 1-2-4-All for the opening, World Café for the body, and What/So What/Now What for the harvest. LS slots inside any of the AoH method entries in this Library (OST, World Café, ProAction Café, Circle, Theory U, Appreciative Inquiry).

**Sociocracy 3.0 communities** running consent decision-making often use Troika Consulting and Wise Crowds inside their circles for proposal development before formal consent rounds. The two pattern libraries (S3 for governance, LS for meetings) sit naturally side by side.

**Doocratic communities** (Feytopia, Embassy Network successors, open-source projects) use LS structures opportunistically when a working group needs a tighter format than informal conversation provides. The methods do not threaten doocratic culture because they are deployed at the meeting layer, not the governance layer.

### Five entry points beyond your own meetings

1. **Liberatingstructures.com** is the canonical online resource. Bookmark it, read the LS Menu, browse the Sample Strings page. Free and continuously updated.

2. **The Surprising Power of Liberating Structures** by Lipmanowicz and McCandless (2014) is the canonical reference book. Buy a paper copy; it is designed to be referenced repeatedly rather than read once.

3. **Attend a multi-day LS workshop.** McCandless, Lipmanowicz, and trained LS facilitators run multi-day immersions in various cities. Five to ten days of running structures on each other builds embodied fluency that book reading alone does not produce. Training cost is generally lower than for Art of Hosting trainings of comparable depth.

4. **Download the LS App** (Plexus Institute, 2017). Free pocket reference for all 33 structures, useful for in-meeting consultation when you forget a step.

5. **Keith McCandless's Medium articles** (medium.com/@keithmccandless) and the practitioner discussions in the Liberating Structures online forum. The community is active and welcoming to newcomers.

**One caution beyond your own practice.** Not all participatory facilitation is the same, and LS is one tradition among several. Some practitioners find that the LS emphasis on time-bounded structure works against the slower, deeper conversational forms that Circle, Forum, or extended Open Space allow. Both can be true. The skilled facilitator builds a repertoire across traditions rather than committing exclusively to one. Use LS where its modularity serves the room, and reach for slower forms where the question asks for time rather than structure.

---

## 8. Where it gets hard

LS is unusually well-loved by its practitioner community and has accumulated a thinner critique base than older methods like Open Space or Appreciative Inquiry. The tensions that do surface are mostly practitioner-level rather than methodological.

**The discipline problem.** LS structures look simple on the page. Running them well requires discipline that reading alone does not produce. The most common failure mode, named openly by McCandless and Lipmanowicz themselves, is the facilitator who shortens the time allocations, mixes structures together without intention, or skips the structuring invitation because "the group will figure it out." Each shortcut is a small erosion of the structure's design integrity. After a few sessions, the structure has become a name with little of its function intact.

**The cultural assumption problem.** LS was developed in North American organizational development culture, where structured turn-taking, explicit time limits, and direct verbal articulation are cultural defaults. In cultures with stronger indirection norms, where dignity is held through restraint, or where the structuring invitation reads as overly directive, LS can land as alienating. Practitioners working across cultures have developed adaptations, but the underlying cultural assumption is real and worth naming. The book itself does not address this directly.

**The over-modularization problem.** LS's modularity is its strength. The same modularity is its risk. A facilitator who has fallen in love with LS can over-rely on it, running structure after structure across a multi-hour gathering until the participants feel processed rather than included. The remedy is to use LS structures inside larger containers (Circle, Open Space, AoH frames) rather than treating LS as a complete methodology in itself. The most skilled LS practitioners say so explicitly.

**The cost of context-switching.** Each LS structure has its own structuring invitation, its own configuration, its own timing. Moving between structures within a single session requires the facilitator to re-orient the group repeatedly, which has a cognitive cost. For groups that are unused to structured facilitation, the context-switching can produce fatigue. Strings work better when they share a thematic arc; when they are chosen for variety alone, the group feels jerked around.

**The "this is just gimmicky" critique.** From outside the practitioner community, LS is sometimes dismissed as a collection of facilitation gimmicks: cute names, quirky procedures, a self-help framework dressed up as organizational change. This critique is mostly a misreading of the method's underlying claim. The procedural rigour of the five design elements is what distinguishes LS from generic icebreakers or warm-up exercises. The structuring invitation is what gives each method its specific functional behaviour. Practitioners who treat LS as a bag of tricks reproduce the critique.

**The follow-through gap.** A pattern observed across every facilitation method: a 90-minute LS-rich meeting produces real energy, real ideas, and real commitments. Six months later, half the commitments have evaporated. The defenders' answer is that this is the universal problem of post-meeting implementation in unchanged institutional contexts. The critics' answer is that the modular, single-meeting focus of LS makes the gap particularly visible because no LS structure asks the group to plan past the next 90 minutes.

The method's design has held up across more than a decade of practice. The tensions are real but not refutational. Most experienced practitioners say that the discipline problem (point 1) is the load-bearing one; the others are downstream of it.

---

## 9. Companion frameworks and what to read next

LS sits alongside the wider participatory facilitation family and links outward to several adjacent methods and frameworks.

**Open Space Technology** (Harrison Owen, 1985). The self-organising agenda method. LS includes OST in its menu of 33 (structure number 30) and treats it as one of the larger-grained containers that LS structures can sit inside.

**World Café** (Brown and Isaacs, 1995). The rotating-table conversation method. LS includes Conversation Café (a smaller-grained sibling) in its menu, and World Café itself is a frequent host container for LS strings.

**ProAction Café** (Leoprechting and Baeck, ~2005). The action-oriented blend of Open Space and World Café. LS structures like Wise Crowds and Troika Consulting often sit inside ProAction Café sessions as the peer-coaching layer.

**Circle / The Way of Council** (Baldwin and Linnea, 1994; Zimmerman and Coyle, 1996). The deep-listening container. Circle and LS pair well: Circle for opening and closing the relational frame, LS structures for the working middle.

**Appreciative Inquiry** (Cooperrider and Srivastva, 1987). The strengths-based 4D cycle. LS structures like 9 Whys and What/So What/Now What are commonly used inside AI Summits, particularly in the Define and Discover phases.

**Theory U** (Scharmer, 2007). The awareness-based strategic arc. LS structures provide the tactical containers inside a longer Theory U journey, particularly during the prototyping phase on the right side of the U.

**Sociocracy 3.0** (Priest, Bockelbrink, David, 2015). The modular governance pattern library. S3 and LS are sister pattern libraries at different levels of analysis: S3 patterns govern the organisation; LS patterns govern the meeting. Some communities run both.

**Dialogic Organization Development** (Bushe and Marshak, 2015). The contemporary theoretical home for participatory methods. The Bushe and Marshak book positions LS alongside Appreciative Inquiry and Open Space as one of several "dialogic OD" methods.

**Group Pattern Language Project** (Tree Bressen et al., 2011 onward). A different pattern library for facilitation, with a stronger consensus and Quaker influence. Worth reading alongside LS for the alternative-tradition comparison.

**Holacracy and other governance constitutions.** LS is not a governance framework; it is a meeting toolkit. Read Holacracy, Sociocracy 3.0, and the Doocracy entry on the Living Library for the governance layer that LS sits inside.

### Sources

The references below are the primary sources we consulted while writing this entry.

- Henri Lipmanowicz and Keith McCandless, *The Surprising Power of Liberating Structures: Simple Rules to Unleash a Culture of Innovation* (Liberating Structures Press, 2014; copyright 2013). The canonical text.
- [Liberating Structures Menu](https://www.liberatingstructures.com/ls-menu/). The free online repository of all 33 methods with step-by-step procedures.
- [Liberating Structures Sample Strings](https://www.liberatingstructures.com/sample-strings/). Over 100 documented strings combining 2 to 5 structures for specific use cases.
- [About Keith McCandless](https://www.liberatingstructures.com/keith-mccandless). Biographical context including the Foundation for Health Care Quality and Health Forum positions.
- [Liberating Structures, Plexus Institute](https://plexusinstitute.org/ls/). The institutional incubator's documentation.
- Keith McCandless, ["Liberating Structures: Change Methods for Everybody Every Day"](https://keithmccandless.medium.com/liberating-structures-change-methods-for-everybody-every-day-648e9c0d04a7), Medium. The author's own concise framing.
- Christiaan Verwijs, ["Give and get practical and imaginative help from colleagues with 'Troika Consulting'"](https://medium.com/the-liberators/use-troika-consulting-to-help-scrum-teams-coach-and-learn-from-each-other-925a227f52), The Liberators blog. LS in Agile and Scrum contexts.
- ["Liberating Structures: 33 Microstructures for Distributed Leadership"](https://www.si-labs.com/en/articles/liberating-structures/), SI Labs. A practitioner-oriented summary.
- [Liberating Structures in the Elgar Encyclopedia of Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity](https://www.elgaronline.com/display/book/9781035317967/ch70.xml) (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024). Academic recognition.
- Gervase R. Bushe and Robert J. Marshak, *Dialogic Organization Development: The Theory and Practice of Organizational Transformation* (Berrett-Koehler, 2015). Positions LS within the broader dialogic OD family.
- Sharon Avraham, "Art of Hosting and Open Space, for tomorrow," ToGather Flagship internal brief (March 2026). The facilitation lineage context for this entry.